GitLab

For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a buddy - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, users.atw.hu and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, because rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, thatswhathappened.wiki the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He wishes to broaden his range, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an . It's designed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are talking about data here, we really mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for creative functions need to be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without consent need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's construct it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize creators' content on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, mariskamast.net is also highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of delight," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its finest performing markets on the unclear promise of development."

A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them license their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library containing public data from a wide variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, prawattasao.awardspace.info and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for iuridictum.pecina.cz a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is developing, I'm uncertain how long I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.