GitLab

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can anticipate the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to offer it its finest shot. With approximately date news and a little but spirited 14 Billion criterion design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to address mankind's most difficult questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as 2 years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many pushing questions that are less easy to select. Our company, Lightning Rod Labs, has been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be much better at predicting the future (and have seen some appealing improvements - research paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, computing eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion design which is actually on the smaller side. (Some estimates suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from many months back so we have actually developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unknown area to make its finest forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following questions to our AI and determined its action. While we have actually seen prediction enhancements from our training, use these quotes for prop wagering at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, but a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta aspect in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal ...

First, I'll look at the essential points from the posts. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been helpful of his career, attending his video games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even invited her family and friends to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.

Some fans are excited, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly given comments Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not resolving the speculation straight.

I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his evasive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important event, the odds and his reactions suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, possibly around 5%, thinking about all aspects.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a different front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's comparable attempts? Looks like our AI believes they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I'm trying to figure out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I need to comprehend what precisely a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it appears like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to push off defenders. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and technique.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, archmageriseswiki.com to execute the move. The short article discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this technique, which is quite high. ... I also require to think about the defensive methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they might change their defense accordingly, which might either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than 5 appears like a significant number however possible provided their confidence, I would approximate a possibility around 60-70% opportunity. This accounts for their preparation, self-confidence in the technique, and the likelihood that they'll utilize it numerous times, particularly if it's reliable early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI may not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling back and forth, however in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.

From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration during a previous halftime program when Trump was present in 2018. That seems substantial since it reveals he's done it before, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent posts, it points out that Lamar is moving away from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That might imply he's less likely to deal with Trump this time.

However, he's also associated with a fight with Drake, which may offer him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a character assassination match from Drake, so perhaps he bewares about including any controversial tunes in the performance. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar might feel obliged to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements throughout the halftime show, so there's a threat that such content might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making strong proceed big phases. He's the first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which may provide him more imaginative flexibility. Plus, his past habits suggests he's not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I likewise remember reading that Lamar expressed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might suggest he's less motivated to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal problems, and the occasion's context-the possibility appears to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: forum.altaycoins.com 25% chance

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the truth that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Looks like theres somewhat of a possibility that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't mean to cause offense which he actually found it funny himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which may show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Looking at the short articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food lover and loves cheeseburgers. There's an article specifically about his love for food, forum.pinoo.com.tr which recommends that he's an individual who delights in consuming, especially with his group. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, especially if the scenario is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't fool the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and believes anything can occur when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to determine the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, however there's some historical information that may influence this prediction.

First, I check out through the articles offered. They all mention the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has come up regularly than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, prawattasao.awardspace.info which is about 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, but it's not a big distinction.

However, I keep in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is normally thought about random. The slight historic edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making predictions, asteroidsathome.net often individuals weigh historic information even if it's not statistically significant. So, I should think about whether this historic bias needs to influence the probability.

After thinking of it, library.kemu.ac.ke I decide that while the historical data shows a minor choice for tails, it's not statistically significant adequate to move the likelihood away from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the minor historical edge exists but doesn't override the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably think the exact same. BUT, its official now since our AI states the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the possibility that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty major accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of articles that discuss conspiracy theories suggesting referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some doubtful contact current video games, especially the AFC Championship Game. That does seem to stimulate some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get frustrated when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "ludicrous." They say there's no evidence of organized predisposition. That's a strong declaration from the individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it might imply there's no real basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some truth to it.

Looking at the articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also mentioned that analytical analysis does not show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said information reveals the Chiefs have been punished more since 2022. That's intriguing since if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate fewer penalties, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely really low. Maybe not zero because you can't rule out every possibility, but extremely not likely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even the game still? I think I'll need to wait and see how the game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great video game! And hey, if it turns out our AI was wrong about everything, at least it can gain from this.