GitLab

U.S. Foreign Policy
Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has actually been the leading online forum for serious conversation of American diplomacy and worldwide affairs. The magazine has included contributions from many leading global affairs experts.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Membership
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-[ai](https://vivainmueble.com). Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the moment. MLA Cite not available at the moment. APSA Cite not available at the minute. APA Cite not available at the minute


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint permissions here.




In the early 1950s, the United States faced a critical intelligence obstacle in its blossoming competitors with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance photos from The second world war could no longer offer adequate intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. security abilities were no longer able to permeate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This deficiency spurred an adventurous moonshot effort: the advancement of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a few years, U-2 missions were delivering crucial intelligence, catching images of Soviet rocket installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a comparable juncture. Competition between Washington and its rivals over the future of the global order is magnifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States should take benefit of its first-rate economic sector and sufficient capacity for innovation to outcompete its foes. The U.S. intelligence community need to harness the nation's sources of strength to deliver insights to policymakers at the speed of today's world. The integration of synthetic intelligence, particularly through big language models, uses groundbreaking opportunities to improve intelligence operations and analysis, allowing the delivery of faster and more appropriate assistance to decisionmakers. This technological transformation includes considerable downsides, nevertheless, specifically as enemies exploit comparable improvements to uncover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States should challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, first to protect itself from opponents who may use the innovation for ill, and initially to use AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.

For the U.S. national security neighborhood, fulfilling the guarantee and managing the peril of AI will need deep technological and cultural changes and a desire to change the way companies work. The U.S. intelligence and military communities can harness the potential of AI while alleviating its intrinsic threats, making sure that the United States maintains its competitive edge in a quickly developing worldwide landscape. Even as it does so, the United States need to transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, how the nation plans to fairly and safely utilize AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's potential to reinvent the intelligence community depends on its capability to process and examine vast quantities of data at unprecedented speeds. It can be challenging to analyze large amounts of collected information to produce time-sensitive warnings. U.S. intelligence services could utilize AI systems' pattern recognition capabilities to determine and alert human experts to possible risks, such as rocket launches or military movements, or crucial worldwide advancements that analysts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This capability would guarantee that important warnings are timely, actionable, and pertinent, permitting for more effective actions to both rapidly emerging dangers and emerging policy opportunities. Multimodal designs, which incorporate text, images, and audio, improve this analysis. For example, using AI to cross-reference satellite images with signals intelligence could provide a detailed view of military motions, enabling faster and more accurate danger assessments and potentially brand-new means of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence analysts can likewise offload repetitive and lengthy tasks to makers to concentrate on the most fulfilling work: generating original and much deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence neighborhood's total insights and efficiency. A fine example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence firms invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The abilities of language models have grown significantly advanced and accurate-OpenAI's just recently launched o1 and o3 models demonstrated substantial progress in accuracy and thinking ability-and can be used to even more rapidly equate and sum up text, audio, and video files.

Although difficulties remain, future systems trained on greater amounts of non-English information might be capable of critical subtle distinctions in between dialects and understanding the meaning and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By counting on these tools, the intelligence community could focus on training a cadre of highly specialized linguists, who can be difficult to discover, often struggle to survive the clearance procedure, and take a long time to train. And of course, by making more foreign language materials available across the right agencies, U.S. intelligence services would be able to quicker triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to choose the needles in the haystack that actually matter.

The value of such speed to policymakers can not be undervalued. Models can quickly sift through intelligence data sets, open-source details, and standard human intelligence and produce draft summaries or initial analytical reports that experts can then verify and improve, making sure the final products are both detailed and accurate. Analysts might partner with an innovative AI assistant to work through analytical problems, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collaborative fashion, improving each version of their analyses and providing finished intelligence quicker.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, covertly broke into a secret Iranian facility and stole about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of documents and a more 55,000 files saved on CDs, including images and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior authorities positioned immense pressure on intelligence professionals to produce detailed assessments of its content and whether it indicated an ongoing effort to construct an Iranian bomb. But it took these experts several months-and hundreds of hours of labor-to translate each page, review it by hand for relevant content, and incorporate that details into evaluations. With today's AI capabilities, the first 2 steps in that process could have been achieved within days, maybe even hours, permitting analysts to understand and contextualize the intelligence quickly.

One of the most fascinating applications is the way AI might change how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, allowing them to communicate straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such abilities would allow users to ask particular questions and get summed up, pertinent details from thousands of reports with source citations, helping them make informed decisions rapidly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI offers numerous advantages, it also poses considerable brand-new dangers, particularly as adversaries establish comparable innovations. China's developments in AI, especially in computer vision and monitoring, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian routine, it lacks privacy constraints and civil liberty securities. That deficit enables massive data collection practices that have yielded information sets of enormous size. Government-sanctioned AI models are trained on vast quantities of individual and behavioral information that can then be used for numerous purposes, such as security and social control. The existence of Chinese business, such as Huawei, in telecommunications systems and software worldwide could offer China with ready access to bulk data, notably bulk images that can be used to train facial acknowledgment models, a particular concern in countries with big U.S. military bases. The U.S. national security community need to think about how Chinese models built on such comprehensive data sets can provide China a tactical benefit.

And it is not just China. The expansion of "open source" AI models, such as Meta's Llama and those created by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese company DeepSeek, is putting effective AI abilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly economical expenses. A lot of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian programs, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign stars are using large language models to rapidly create and spread incorrect and malicious content or to conduct cyberattacks. As experienced with other intelligence-related innovations, such as signals intercept capabilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every incentive to share a few of their AI developments with customer states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary business, consequently increasing the hazard to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence neighborhood's AI designs will end up being attractive targets for enemies. As they grow more effective and main to U.S. nationwide security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being vital nationwide properties that must be protected against enemies looking for wiki.lafabriquedelalogistique.fr to jeopardize or manipulate them. The intelligence community should invest in establishing safe and secure AI models and in establishing requirements for "red teaming" and constant evaluation to safeguard against possible threats. These teams can use AI to replicate attacks, uncovering potential weaknesses and establishing strategies to alleviate them. Proactive procedures, including partnership with allies on and financial investment in counter-AI innovations, will be important.

THE NEW NORMAL

These difficulties can not be wanted away. Waiting too long for AI technologies to completely mature carries its own risks; U.S. intelligence capabilities will fall behind those of China, Russia, and other powers that are going complete steam ahead in developing AI. To make sure that intelligence-whether time-sensitive cautions or longer-term strategic insight-continues to be a benefit for the United States and its allies, the country's intelligence neighborhood needs to adapt and innovate. The intelligence services need to quickly master the use of AI innovations and make AI a fundamental component in their work. This is the only sure way to guarantee that future U.S. presidents receive the very best possible intelligence support, remain ahead of their adversaries, and secure the United States' sensitive capabilities and operations. Implementing these modifications will require a cultural shift within the intelligence community. Today, intelligence analysts mainly develop items from raw intelligence and information, with some support from existing AI models for voice and images analysis. Progressing, intelligence officials should explore consisting of a hybrid technique, in line with existing laws, utilizing AI models trained on unclassified commercially available information and refined with classified details. This amalgam of technology and conventional intelligence gathering could result in an AI entity offering instructions to images, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an incorporated view of regular and anomalous activity, automated imagery analysis, and automated voice translation.

To speed up the shift, intelligence leaders must promote the advantages of AI integration, stressing the improved capabilities and effectiveness it offers. The cadre of recently appointed chief AI officers has actually been established in U.S. intelligence and defense to function as leads within their companies for promoting AI development and getting rid of barriers to the innovation's implementation. Pilot jobs and early wins can develop momentum and self-confidence in AI's abilities, motivating more comprehensive adoption. These officers can take advantage of the know-how of nationwide labs and other partners to check and improve AI designs, ensuring their effectiveness and security. To institutionalize change, leaders ought to develop other organizational rewards, consisting of promotions and training opportunities, to reward innovative approaches and those staff members and systems that show reliable usage of AI.

The White House has actually produced the policy needed for using AI in nationwide security agencies. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order relating to safe, protected, and trustworthy AI detailed the assistance required to fairly and securely use the technology, and National Security Memorandum 25, issued in October 2024, is the country's fundamental technique for harnessing the power and managing the dangers of AI to advance nationwide security. Now, Congress will require to do its part. Appropriations are required for departments and firms to develop the facilities required for innovation and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and evaluations, and continue to purchase assessment to ensure that the United States is building trusted and high-performing AI innovations.

Intelligence and military communities are dedicated to keeping humans at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have created the structures and tools to do so. Agencies will need standards for how their analysts must use AI designs to make certain that intelligence products meet the intelligence community's standards for reliability. The federal government will likewise need to maintain clear assistance for managing the information of U.S. citizens when it pertains to the training and usage of big language designs. It will be essential to stabilize making use of emerging technologies with safeguarding the privacy and civil liberties of residents. This indicates enhancing oversight mechanisms, upgrading appropriate structures to reflect the capabilities and threats of AI, and promoting a culture of AI advancement within the national security apparatus that harnesses the potential of the technology while safeguarding the rights and freedoms that are foundational to American society.

Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the leading edge of overhead and satellite images by establishing numerous of the essential innovations itself, winning the AI race will need that community to reimagine how it partners with personal industry. The personal sector, which is the main methods through which the government can realize AI progress at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research study, data centers, and computing power. Given those companies' advancements, intelligence firms ought to prioritize leveraging commercially available AI models and improving them with categorized data. This technique makes it possible for the intelligence neighborhood to quickly expand its abilities without having to start from scratch, enabling it to remain competitive with enemies. A recent partnership between NASA and IBM to produce the world's largest geospatial foundation model-and the subsequent release of the design to the AI neighborhood as an open-source project-is an excellent presentation of how this type of public-private collaboration can work in practice.

As the national security neighborhood incorporates AI into its work, it should guarantee the security and durability of its models. Establishing requirements to release generative AI safely is important for maintaining the integrity of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's new AI Security Center and its partnership with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.

As the United States faces growing competition to form the future of the worldwide order, it is immediate that its intelligence agencies and military profit from the country's innovation and leadership in AI, focusing especially on large language designs, to provide faster and more pertinent details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight needed to navigate a more complicated, competitive, and content-rich world.