GitLab

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can forecast the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to give it its best shot. With as much as date news and a little however spirited 14 Billion specification model, our AI is boldly forecasting the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to address humanity's hardest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many pushing concerns that are less easy to select. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has actually been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be better at anticipating the future (and have actually seen some appealing improvements - research paper incoming). This week we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion model which is actually on the smaller sized side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from numerous months ago so we have actually constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified territory to make its best forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We posed the following questions to our AI and gauged its action. While we have seen prediction improvements from our training, utilize these price quotes for prop wagering at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% chance

And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, however a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposal ...

First, I'll take a look at the crucial points from the short articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor since 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been encouraging of his career, attending his video games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even invited her family and friends to the Super Bowl, showing her dedication.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially offered remarks Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship private and not dealing with the speculation straight.

I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his evasive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential event, the chances and his responses suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, possibly around 5%, thinking about all aspects.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a various front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Appears like our AI believes they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I'm attempting to find out the possibility that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend just what a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it looks like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and akropolistravel.com method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to execute the move. The post points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I also require to consider the defensive strategies of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they may change their defense accordingly, which might either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than five looks like a substantial number however possible given their confidence, I would approximate a possibility around 60-70% chance. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the technique, and the probability that they'll utilize it several times, especially if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement during a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That appears substantial because it shows he's done it previously, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent short articles, it points out that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on individual expression. That might imply he's less most likely to deal with Trump this time.

However, he's likewise involved in a fight with Drake, which might provide him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a character assassination suit from Drake, so maybe he's cautious about consisting of any questionable tunes in the performance. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he may still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile event, Lamar might feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations during the show, so there's a threat that such material might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making bold carry on big stages. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which may provide him more creative flexibility. Plus, his previous habits suggests he's not shy about expressing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.

But I also remember reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might show he's less motivated to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's focusing on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the event's context-the possibility appears to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% chance

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the truth that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Appears like theres somewhat of a chance that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't mean to trigger offense and that he in fact found it amusing himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Looking at the short articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food lover and larsaluarna.se loves cheeseburgers. There's a short article particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who enjoys consuming, especially with his group. So, if there were plans to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, especially if the scenario is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't trick the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and thinks anything can happen when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to determine the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historical information that might influence this forecast.

First, I read through the posts provided. They all mention the historical data of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has shown up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, but it's not a big distinction.

However, I bear in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is generally thought about random. The minor historical edge for tails might be due to opportunity. But when making forecasts, often individuals weigh historic data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I should consider whether this historical bias should affect the probability.

After thinking about it, I choose that while the historic information reveals a slight choice for tails, it's not statistically significant enough to move the possibility away from 0.5. So, championsleage.review I'll go with 0.5 as the possibility, chessdatabase.science acknowledging that the slight historic edge exists but doesn't bypass the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would probably believe the exact same. BUT, its official now since our AI states the chances are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty major allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of posts that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful hire current video games, especially the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get irritated when their group loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "ludicrous." They state there's no proof of systematic bias. That's a strong statement from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it might indicate there's no real basis or ratemywifey.com they would have resolved it differently if there was some truth to it.

Looking at the articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise pointed out that statistical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said information reveals the Chiefs have actually been penalized more since 2022. That's fascinating since if they were getting special treatment, you might expect fewer penalties, right?

...

So, putting it all together, the probability that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't eliminate every possibility, however exceptionally not likely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth watching the game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great game! And hey, if it ends up our AI was incorrect about whatever, at least it can gain from this.